Flying Mice LLC

Abstract of Preliminary Findings 
on Interactive Oscillations of Dessicated Fruits 
in Aqueous Media

By

E. Beeker Ph.D.


ABSTRACT

Introduction

The object of our inquiry - interactive oscillations of dessicated fruits in aqueous media - is a well known phenomenon, at least in some circles, but has never been thoroughly researched. In our preliminary test, we used 5 types of aqueous media and 5 types of dessicated fruit, to obtain a broad-spectrum view of the limits of the phenomenon.

The Question, as initially proposed, seemed simple - to wit: why does a raisin repeatedly rise and fall when immersed in orange soda? When pondering the broader implications of the question, several possibilities came immediately to mind:

  1. It is a property of the raisin
    1. A raisin is a fruit
    2. A raisin has a high surface area to volume ratio - in other words, a raisin is wrinkled
    3. A raisin is relatively non-massive for it's volume
    4. A raisin posesses "raisin-ness"
  2. It is a property of the orange soda
    1. Orange Soda is aqueous
    2. Orange Soda is carbonated
    3. Orange Soda is translucent
    4. Orange Soda is orange
The various test materials were carefully selected to satisfy these demanding criteria. Luckily such materials were also procured without undue expenditures of grant money.

Substances Chosen

Substance I - california raisin - control
Substance II - chocolate-covered raisin - satisfying 1.1 & 1.4
Substance III - children's fruit snack rolled into raisin size & shape - satisfying 1.1 & 1.3
Substance IV - pitted prune - satisfying 1.1, 1.2 & 1.3
Substance V - whole prune - satisfying 1.1 & 1.2

Fluids Chosen

Fluid  - de-ionized water - satisfying 2.1
Fluid  - cold coffee - satisfying 2.1 & 2.3
Fluid  - naturally carbonated spring water - satisfying 2.1, & 2.2
Fluid  - orange soda - control
Fluid  - tap water dyed orange - satisfying 2.1, 2.3 and 2.4


Results:
sank - substance sank to bottom of container
bloat - substance acquired volume and mass from surrounding aqueous media
bubbles - substance became covered with bubbles of carbon dioxide
lifted - substance partly lifted, but did not detach from bottom of container
floated - substance rose completely to surface of aqueous media
dissolved - substance dissolved into aqueous media
change color - substance changed color from dark brown to tan
interrupted - substance was removed from aqueous media


Conclusion

As expected, the control combination (Substance I & Fluid )exhibited the desired oscillation, but unexpectedly, so did the combination of Substance IV and Fluid . In fact, the latter substance proved far more persistent at oscillating than the control combination, after a long initial quiet period.

When we carefully examine the evidence, we see a pattern in that the two substances which evinced oscillation shared these characteristics:

Substances which did not exhibit all three characteristics failed to oscillate.

Only one aqueous fluid supported the oscillation phenomenon - Fluid ; but Fluid  supported pre-oscillation behavior - 'lifting' from the bottom of the container, but not quite breaking away to rise freely. These fluids shared these characteristics:

Fluids which did not exhibit both characteristics did not support oscillation or pre-oscillation behavior. The difference between them being that Fluid  was colored orange and that Fluid  contained less dissolved carbon dioxide gas. The color orange, as evinced by Fluid, seems to have no correlation to the oscillation.

Theory

Substance is placed in fluid and, being heavier than fluid, sinks. Fluid contains dissolved carbon dioxide gas which accumulates in wrinkles in fruit's skin until substance plus CO2 bubbles is lighter than aqueous fluid. Substance rises to surface of fluid where bubbles break, losing CO2. Substance becomes heavier than fluid, which causes substance to sink, where substance again accumulate bubbles, etc. thus evincing oscillation.

The implications of the revelations explicit in this experiment should be obvious. Further derivations of the inital theorem await further funding from our generous patrons.


Acknowledgements

We would like to thank:


Hojoon Park, Ph.D.

For his suggestions concerning prunes

Clash Bowley

For doing the grunt work

Vincent Rose

For his entertainment value

Stephen Shefsky

For coming up with the whole enchillada


Grant money was supplied by the following organizations:
 

U.S. Department of Largesse, Dole Division
U.S. Department of Bureaucracy, Ribbon Rouge Grant Program
University of Bedford, Jonah Gulpt Buoyancy Labs
California Plum & Prune Growers Associative
California Raisin Growers Collective
Les Hommes en Noir
The Ford Frick Foundation



e-mail Dr. Beeker: beeker@flyingmice.com


Return to "Ask Dr. Beeker"